It is now clear that Republicans cannot unilaterally tackle Obamcare.
But, I will suggest, it is also clear that both Republicans and Democrats can't even begin to have conversations about fixing the health law until they can agree on broader principles.
See my op-ed at CNBC.com.
A Health Care Reform Blog––Bob Laszewski's review of the latest developments in federal health policy, health care reform, and marketplace activities in the health care financing business.
Showing posts with label Obamacare repeal and replace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obamacare repeal and replace. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 12, 2017
Thursday, July 13, 2017
What's Really Behind the Cruz Amendment to the Republican Senate Plan to Replace Obamacare?
A Cunning Strategy to Back Door Risk Pools and Market Segmentation
Ted Cruz has offered an amendment—since included in the latest Republican Senate draft—that would enable health insurance plans to offer stripped down coverage outside the current Obamacare compliant individual market. Anytime spent covered by them would be considered a break in service and subject the consumer to the six-month lockout provision should they want to get into the standard market. Carriers offering these plans could not deny pre-existing conditions but could up-rate sicker people.
Critics, including the health insurance industry trade associations, have come out against the idea because it would bifurcate the market into two separate pools—the healthier “Cruz pool” and the standard individual market subject to all of the current Obamacare consumer protections.
Tuesday, June 27, 2017
The Senate Republican Obamacare Repeal and Replace Bill Will Not Reduce the Cost of Health Insurance
At the core of Republican objectives for the "repealing and replacing" of Obamacare is bringing down the cost of health insurance––not just the premiums but the out-of-pocket costs people pay as well.
If implemented, the Senate Republican bill may actually end up increasing costs compared to Obamacare.
If implemented, the Senate Republican bill may actually end up increasing costs compared to Obamacare.
Wednesday, May 17, 2017
Here's Who Gets the Blame If Obamacare Fails (Hint It's Not Obama)
With Obamacare's individual health insurance market struggling, the debate has shifted to who takes the blame if it fails.
Supporters of the law are willing to admit that it is failing but that it's Trump's fault.
Trump's constant undermining of the ACA is giving his opponents ammunition in the blame game.
Thursday, March 16, 2017
Monday, March 13, 2017
Let’s Not Let the Republicans Make the Obamacare Replacement Debate About the Congressional Budget Office—Fewer People Will Be Covered and Many Will See Big Cost Increases
If you carve a huge chunk of revenue out of Obamacare and shift more subsidies to the middle class it should not be a surprise that the lower income folks will pay the price
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that 14 million of people would lose coverage in 2018, 21 million in 2020, and 24 million in 2026 if the House Republican plan is allowed to significantly amend the Affordable Health Care Act (Obamacare).
In my last post, I called the House Republican bill "mind boggling" for the negative impact I believe it would have on the number of those uninsured and the viability of the individual insurance market. Guess the CBO agrees with me.
The CBO's report came after the Brookings Institute estimated
15 million people would lose Medicaid and individual health insurance coverage
at the end of ten years under the Republican plan. The arguably more business
oriented S&P Global estimated between 6 million and 10 million people would
lose coverage between 2020 and 2024.
Republicans are jumping on the CBO estimate reminding us
that the CBO’s Obamacare projections haven’t been perfect in the past.
This is not the issue.
What Republicans are proposing, and how those proposals will
impact how many people have insurance in this country, is the issue.
Tuesday, March 7, 2017
The House Republican Obamacare Replacement Plan: Mind Boggling
It won't work.
Obamacare works for the poorest that have affordable health insurance because all of the program's subsidies tilt in their favor.
Obamacare doesn't work well for the working and middle class who get much less support––particularly those who earn more than 400% of the federal poverty level, who constitute 40% of the population and don't get any help.
Because so many don't do well under the law, only about 40% of the subsidy eligible have signed up and, with so many insurers losing lots of money, the scheme is not financially sustainable because not enough healthy people are on the rolls to pay for the sick.
To fix it, House Republicans are proposing a very attractive program for the better off and, with the Medicaid rollback, gutting the program for the poor to be able to pay for it.
Obamacare works for the poorest that have affordable health insurance because all of the program's subsidies tilt in their favor.
Obamacare doesn't work well for the working and middle class who get much less support––particularly those who earn more than 400% of the federal poverty level, who constitute 40% of the population and don't get any help.
Because so many don't do well under the law, only about 40% of the subsidy eligible have signed up and, with so many insurers losing lots of money, the scheme is not financially sustainable because not enough healthy people are on the rolls to pay for the sick.
To fix it, House Republicans are proposing a very attractive program for the better off and, with the Medicaid rollback, gutting the program for the poor to be able to pay for it.
Wednesday, March 1, 2017
The Cockroach Proposal––Selling Insurance Across State Lines
I call support for giving insurance companies the ability to sell insurance across state lines the cockroach proposal.
As bad as it is, you just can't kill the damn thing!
Last night, President Trump once again listed this idea in his address to Congress as one of his health care talking points.
Here is a post about the idea I published on this blog a year ago in the midst of the Republican presidential primary:
Any candidate that suggests such a scheme only shows how unsophisticated he and his advisers are when it comes to understanding how the insurance markets really work––or could work.
I gave a speech to 750 health insurance brokers and consultants in DC last week.
When selling health insurance across state lines, something Trump and a number of other Republican presidential candidates have been pushing, was mentioned the audience literally laughed. That's what health insurance professionals who spend their days in the market think of it!
As bad as it is, you just can't kill the damn thing!
Last night, President Trump once again listed this idea in his address to Congress as one of his health care talking points.
Here is a post about the idea I published on this blog a year ago in the midst of the Republican presidential primary:
Any candidate that suggests such a scheme only shows how unsophisticated he and his advisers are when it comes to understanding how the insurance markets really work––or could work.
I gave a speech to 750 health insurance brokers and consultants in DC last week.
When selling health insurance across state lines, something Trump and a number of other Republican presidential candidates have been pushing, was mentioned the audience literally laughed. That's what health insurance professionals who spend their days in the market think of it!
Tuesday, February 28, 2017
Obamacare's Insurance Exchanges Are Self-Destructing––and That is Why Obamacare Needs to Be Fixed in 2017
Obamacare was self-destructing the day before Donald Trump was elected, and the Republican victory, with their talk of "repeal and replace," has only accelerated things.
Aetna's CEO recently said that the Obamacare insurance exchanges are in a "death spiral."
Cynthia Cox, of the "non-partisan" Kaiser Family Foundation responded that the insurance exchanges "are not really in a death spiral yet." She would know more than the Aetna CEO whose company lost $450 million in the Obamacare individual market last year.
Aetna's CEO recently said that the Obamacare insurance exchanges are in a "death spiral."
Cynthia Cox, of the "non-partisan" Kaiser Family Foundation responded that the insurance exchanges "are not really in a death spiral yet." She would know more than the Aetna CEO whose company lost $450 million in the Obamacare individual market last year.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Subscribe
Avoid having to check back.
Subscribe to Health Care Policy and Marketplace Review and receive an email each time we post.