As part of his broader speech on economic issues John McCain today called for high income seniors to pay more for their Part D drug coverage. Couples making more than $160,000 a year would pay higher premiums.
This is a good idea and a down payment on something I believe is ultimately unavoidable--means testing for entitlement programs.
It isn't news that the cost of senior programs--Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid--are not sustainable. The current federal cost for these three programs now tops $27,000 a year for each senior over the age of 65. That number increased 24% since 2000--after adjusting for inflation.
Part D alone added $8 trillion to Medicare's 75-year unfunded liability--twice the unfunded liability of the entire Social Security system and a fourth of Medicare's overall unfunded liability.
[Part D was an irresponsible expansion of entitlement programs that John McCain voted against.]
The cost of these entitlement programs is unsustainable in the long-term.
Some believe that a better use of the market will help us control costs. Some believe that more use of the government is needed to control costs. Either way, market competition or government controls, means paying out less to someone.
Many people believe means testing--the richer getting less or paying more for these benefits--is bad policy because it has the potential of creating a two-tiered system. They worry that if the more wealthy don't share in these generous benefits we will lose important political support for these entitlement programs and the less well off will suffer. That is possible.
But when the day is done, how are we going to control these costs and just who is it that will get less? Will it be seniors, drug companies, insurers, doctors, hospitals? Well likely all of these. But why not the better off getting less help as well?
Means testing would appear to me to be the easiest way to reduce the cost of these programs and do the least harm.
McCain is on the right track here and I hope he takes means testing even further.
An Analysis of Senator John McCain's Health Care Reform Plan
Means Testing for Medicare--It's Unavoidable If Politically Problematic
Good Riddance to Karl Rove--How Part D Left an $8 Trillion Debt and Got Them Nothing
Avoid having to check back. Subscribe to Health Care Policy and Marketplace Review and receive an email each time we post.
- ► 2017 (28)
- ► 2016 (27)
- ► 2015 (26)
- ► 2014 (36)
- ► 2013 (48)
- ► 2012 (32)
- ► 2011 (36)
- ► 2009 (161)
- John McCain's Health Care Plan and the Uninsurable...
- HMO Executive Earnings Are the Subject of Criticis...
- The Genetic Discrimination Bill Shows Us Just How ...
- What Good Has Private Medicare Done for Shareholde...
- Health Care Reform Will Be a Long Shot in 2009
- Wall Street Continues to Be Disappointed in Manage...
- Obesity and Smoking--One Step Forward and Two Step...
- Is the Bush Administration in Favor of Provider Tr...
- Provider Payment "Food Fight"
- The "Frontline" Report on International Health Car...
- McCain Would Increase Medicare Part D Premiums for...
- Nonprofit Hospitals Hardly Unprofitable––A Bad Tim...
- Elizabeth Edwards Criticizes John McCain's Health ...
- Health Plan Stock Prices Hard Hit Recently--Then T...
- ▼ April (14)
- ► 2007 (235)